Europe’s Latest Anti-African Bias: Euro 49 bn for 1 bn Africans vs. Euro 110 bn for 11 m Greeks

5. maj 2010 af A. Dualeh

 

 May 2, 2010 proved to be another spectacular landmark for the anti-African policy-making of the European Union. The unfortunate event highly illustrates the colonial and racist nature of the 27-nation club. However, one must admit that most of the European countries are devoid of Anti-African prejudices and policies, except for their misperception of the World and African History, which again should not be attributed to them, because most of them followed the track of Anglo-French Orientalist and Africanologist pioneers in falsification.

 

Dr. Muhammad Shamsaddin Megalommatis

May 05, 2010

 

 May 2, 2010 proved to be another spectacular landmark for the anti-African policy-making of the European Union. The unfortunate event highly illustrates the colonial and racist nature of the 27-nation club. However, one must admit that most of the European countries are devoid of Anti-African prejudices and policies, except for their misperception of the World and African History, which again should not be attributed to them, because most of them followed the track of Anglo-French Orientalist and Africanologist pioneers in falsification.

 

As it comes, all the Africans, ethnic – religious groups, peoples, administrations and intellectuals, activists and thinkers must realize that a critical dimension of today´s troubles of Africa is due to the extension of the pernicious colonial policy of England and France throughout Europe.

 

Certainly this problem hinges on most of the world affairs, creating problems to diverse nations and administrations, notably the Islamic World, China, India, Russia, Turkey, and the indigenous American nations.

 

Anglo-French Bias Against Africa – within EU

 

In fact, by participating in the European Union since the moment of its inception, France viewed the Union-under-preparation as a larger body that should be hijacked in terms of foreign policy; instead of shaping a composite foreign policy (out of compromises made among its members and their foreign policies), the EU-under formation should form its own foreign policy on the basis of the French foreign policy, thus reflecting only (and being useful to) French national interests. Thus, the French Anti-African policy would become European, gathering greater support for France´s racist bias.

 

Almost all the other members of the European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC) had a certain colonial past, notably Italy, Holland, Germany and Belgium. However, the Italian colonialism (in striking contrast with the French colonialism) was not an evil, racist project; the German colonialism was a very brief phenomenon (still not properly assessed and understood), and the Belgian colonialism was limited in Congo. Only the Dutch performed in Indonesia a cruel colonial policy similar to that of the French and the English.

 

In brief, the majority of the population of the ECSC member states opposed the inhumanity of the French colonialism. However, unfortunately, their politicians, statesmen, and diplomats failed to both, dissociate the European foreign policy from the evil colonial policy of France and avert the French hijacking of the European institutions and bodies that so much tarnishes the image of today´s average European.

 

England´s adhesion to the European Community (1973) strengthened the colonial character of the body, and facilitated the French hijacking, and the imposition of colonial norms and standards on the foreign policy decision-making of the European institutions.

 

The later adhesion of other European countries (representing the South, the North and the East of Europe) should have minimized (if not eliminated) the colonial character of the European foreign policy decision-making processes and targets. Unfortunately, this did not happen because the majority of the 27-member states´ administrations failed to discern the apt and discreet Anglo-French policy of projecting their own colonial needs, interests, viewpoints, concepts and approaches onto the rest.

 

Today, EU African policy is in striking contrast with the humane approach to Africa, which is shared among Germans, Italians, Scandinavians, Poles, Hungarians, Romanians and others; EU African policy is a mere extension of the ominous Anti-African machinations of the Foreign Office and the Quai d´ Orsay.

 

This tragic development should become the central target of the European policy of all the African countries and nations who have to fight and strike back in order to outfox the villainous Anglo-French usage of the outright majority of the EU member states, and of the European institutions for the sake of their own Africa-unfriendly projects.

 

EU policy toward Africa must be formed in Rome, Berlin, Warsaw, Stockholm, Budapest, Copenhagen, Bucharest, Helsinki, Prague, etc. – not in Paris and London. African diplomats should make a priority for them to turn Germans, Italians, Scandinavians, Poles, Hungarians, Romanians and others overtly against the Anglo-French diplomats, administrators and deputies at Brussels and Strasbourg, and impose another African policy for the EU.

 

The Euro-African relationship is certainly complex and its aspects are unbalanced and even disruptive. European colonialism, intolerance, and racism are omnipresent at all levels of the said relationship, educational, academic, cultural, socio-behavioural, political and economic.

 

Whereas historical falsification is denounced and refuted, and great efforts have been deployed in this regard, prejudice and bias are difficult to measure. Sometimes, economic comparisons help reveal the extent of the bias involved.

 

The European economic aid to Africa is not offered without conditions that the African dictators do their ingenious best to observe; these conditions help only the colonial powers materialize their nefarious target, e.g. socioeconomic development in Africa under terms of continued dependence, and with no disruption of the earlier implemented colonial infrastructure.

 

If we still put this critical dimension aside, and we limit our approach to mere figures, we will be confronted with an incredible situation. According to EU Business (http://www.eubusiness.com/topics/development/mdg.10/), in 2009, “the EU aid level has slightly decreased and amounted €49bn”. The report, published on April 21, 2010, makes state of an action plan adopted by the European Commission with respect to speeding up “progress towards the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs)”. It is true that the EU has expressed willingness for more generous aid to Africa. The said amount “corresponds to 0.42% of EU GNI, making the EU still far from meeting the intermediate collective target of 0,56% GNI by 2010, before reaching 0.7% EU GNI by 2015″.

 

As a matter of fact, if we take into consideration the entire population of Africa (slightly above 1,000,000,000 people), we realize that, in 2009, the EU aid to Africa represented a meager Euro 49 per person. Some may still call it “aid”, others would describe it as “excuse”, whereas many would consider it as “almsgiving for the slaves of the hypocritical and the perfidious”.

 

What is the value of an African and a European for the evil EU authorities?

 

A few days ago, on May 2, EU finance ministers approved a useless and otherwise unprecedented bailout of Greece that will be co-financed with the IMF (http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aidjix_TLtHE&pos=2). The measure was mainly justified as an effort to prevent contagion. What had happened?

 

Following a catastrophic mismanagement of the country by almost all the governments since 1974, and the impact that the deterioration of the global economic situation had on Greece, the budget deficit stood at 12.7 of the GDP (and even worse in April 2010, at 13.6%); as a result, the rising debt levels (113% of GDP in 2009) led to increased borrowing costs, which in turn could end in default”.

 

The giant bailout of Greece endorsed by the European governments amounts to Euro 110 bn (US $ 146); this colossal amount of money for a small country (11 million people) is not expected to definitely solve the grave situation, and many analysts believe that it will be impossible for the Greek government to effectively implement the measures (remarkable budget cuts, raise of the retirement age, raise of the sates tax) announced. But this is not the subject of the present article.

 

The aforementioned bailout total amount means that EU lends every Greek citizen ca. Euro 11000, charging ca. 4 – 5% (below market rate). Of course, the amount covers three years, period for which the rescue funds will replace commercial borrowing - which became impossible due to Greece´s zero credibility in the world markets. On annual basis, every Greek will be bailed out with ca. Euro 3670.

 

If we now compare the two figures, EU aid to Africa (Euro 49 per person) and EU aid to Greece (Euro 3670 per person), we safely conclude that a European citizen´s value – for the discriminatory and insensitive European statesmen, administrators and diplomats – equals that of 75 Africans!

 

The incredible differentiation, never explicitly admitted by the hypocritical European elite of partiality, corruption and immorality, but majestically revealed through the only reality – that of the figures –, illuminates perfectly well every European anti-African bias and fallacy, injustice, indifference, and mercilessness.

 

The inexcusable tolerance toward African tyrants, like the inhuman gangster Al Bashir of Khartoum, the Freemasonic butcher Kibaki of Nairobi, and the cannibal Zenawi of Abyssinia (Fake Ethiopia), the paranoid demonization of the Hamitic – Kushitic nations, the use of disreputable Biblical passages to defame all the Africans (descendants of Ham, son of Noah), the falsification of the African History, the criminal negation of the cataclysmic impact of Africa on the barbaric European aboriginals, the so-called Ancient Greeks and Romans, the apathy of the pseudo-Christian priests of France in front of the Rwandan genocide, the generalized disinformation of the European populations as regards the genocides perpetrated by the English and the French in Africa, the appalling exploitation of Africa´s natural resources, and the overall attitude of the Anglo-French toward the Black Continent, all find their explanation in the killing figures:

 

Euro 3670 for the corrupt consumerist of the South Balkans, i.e. the Greek servant of the Anglo-French Freemasonic lodges

 

vs.

 

Euro 49 for the starving African child whose death is simultaneously and avidly expected by nearby vultures and greedy European Freemasons

 

So, for the EU, every African costs just 1/75 of a European.

 

This incredible shame will remain permanently stuck on the forefront of all representatives of today´s dying European Freemasonic system.

 

It´s time for Africans residing in Europe to let Europeans understand that such a disgrace is always met with an inevitable punishment. In a rising alliance, African immigrants in Europe, European Muslims, pious Catholic and Orthodox Europeans who still stick to Jesus´ preaching, and every destitute and marginalized European can truly demonstrate to Europeans that their elites´ life value is just Euro 0.

 

The idiotic act of sovereign bailout will not save Greece; it can however convince all Africans that today´s unfair World Order should not be saved either.